LongLocks Salon | |
http://www.longlocks.com/salon/
Hairstyles and Styling >> Hair Care Product Reviews >> Australian Organics http://www.longlocks.com/salon/?num=1079818366 Message started by bikerbraid on Mar 20th, 2004 at 10:32pm |
Title: Australian Organics Post by bikerbraid on Mar 20th, 2004 at 10:32pm
For the past month I've been using Australian Organics shampoo and conditioner. I have been amazed at how my hair LOVES these products. From the best that I can tell, there are no silicone based ingredients in either, but my hair is so smooth and silky without the crunchy build up that I get with -cones. I found these at ULTA stores (they also have a web site www.ulta.com).
My hair feels better than it has in a LONG time. I had planned to trim about 4 inches of ends before my son's wedding, but now I think I will only need about and inch trimmed to even up the ends. |
Title: Re: Australian Organics Post by Babyfine on Aug 14th, 2004 at 10:10pm
I have recently become aware of the huge controversy
surrounding Sodium Lauryl and Sodium Laureth Sulfate. Like the 'cones controversy, I never even knew these existed until I started looking at hair care sites. However, the SLS controversy seems to be more"serious" because it is claimed that SLS can cause cancer and all kinds of medical problems. Horrors! At the least, it's supposed to be much more damaging to your hair than shampoos without them. There are other articles discounting all these claims, claiming they are hoaxes put out by the "all natural" companies. At any rate, has anyone noticed a difference by getting rid of SLS? ALL my favorite shampoos, in fact ALL my shampoos in my shower have it in them. Either Sodium Lauryl or Sodium Laureth. I really DON'T feel like going out to buy more shampoo. Getting to the Australian Organics, if I was going to buy more shampoo, it would be in my price range. (I can't afford the more expensive salon shampoos.) Is it better to go with it? Is the SLS controversy really anything? |
Title: Re: Australian Organics Post by bikerbraid on Aug 14th, 2004 at 11:56pm
The articles I've read regarding the health risks seem to be a bit overblown. Some feel that Sodium Lauryl Sulfate is too harsh for their hair. Sodium Laureth Sulfate is milder.
It all comes down to what works for your hair. |
Title: Re: Australian Organics Post by Anais Satin on Aug 14th, 2004 at 11:58pm
If it makes any difference, my switch to SLES helped my scalp calm down and itch less. The one thing we can count on:: SLES is definitely less harsh than SLS. My scalp also produces less oil without SLS. With lauryl, I had to wash every single day to get rid of the greasies.
I don't worry too much about the controversy. To me, the cancer thing sounds a little ... much. My product philosophy? Everything causes cancer eventually anyway. I'd stick with the one that is less harsh. Anais |
Title: Re: Australian Organics Post by Babyfine on Aug 15th, 2004 at 12:08am
Anais: I agree. I don't think I believe the cancer thing.
What is SLES? is that Sodium Laureth Sulfate? |
Title: Re: Australian Organics Post by Anais Satin on Aug 15th, 2004 at 2:35am
Yes, SLES= Sodium laureth sulfate. I didn't understand either, but I guess it's that extra "e".
|
Title: Re: Australian Organics Post by Babyfine on Aug 15th, 2004 at 2:32pm
I read someplace that SLES is much easier on your
hair that SLS, so I have some shampoos that have those so I will be using those. |
LongLocks Salon » Powered by YaBB 2.4! YaBB © 2000-2009. All Rights Reserved. |